A ceasefire must not become the norm

A year after the ceasefire, attacks and the humanitarian emergency continue in Gaza, with no significant political progress in sight. Israel’s advance beyond the agreed line has left more than two million Palestinians in a restricted area of the Strip. Reports also include filmmaker Yuval Abraham’s criticism of the attitude of some sections of Israeli society and his claims about threats from the Government, although the available information does not provide further details.

A ceasefire is a beginning, not a solution. Stability requires more than a pause in hostilities: it needs verifiable commitments, institutions accountable for their decisions and the political will to restrain those who could derail the agreement. When that framework fails to advance, civilians are left exposed and distrust grows. Order does not mean imposing silence; it means ensuring that rules are followed and responsibility is not evaded.

It is also worth remembering that security is a fundamental duty of any state and a legitimate concern for its citizens. But it cannot be separated from the protection of civilians, or used to perpetuate a situation with no prospect of resolution. It is precisely the responsibility of leaders to reconcile these demands and seek a way forward that reduces suffering, rather than allowing force and uncertainty to take the place of politics.

In this case, unity does not mean unanimity, nor does it require people to keep their criticisms to themselves. Abraham’s remarks, as reported by the media, are part of a debate that deserves respect; so do the concerns of those who fear that an inadequate response will leave Israeli society unprotected. That is a serious objection. But recognising it does not mean accepting that a ceasefire without progress is enough: the security and dignity of civilians must advance together.